Quality/Access


The following publications are a combination of relevant documents from the Center for Children and Families (CCF) and other organizations. Go to the Publications section for a list of all CCF documents. For research related to specific policy issues, including SCHIP reauthorization, see the Federal Policy section.


  • Filling an Urgent Need: Improving Children's Access to Dental Care in Medicaid and SCHIP
    Shelly Gehshan, Andrew Snyder, and Julia Paradise, National Academy for State Health Policy and the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured
    July 2008

    In October 2007, the KCMU and NASHP convened a meeting of policy officials and oral health experts to discuss children’s access to dental care in Medicaid and the SCHIP and exchange information and perspectives on the strategies have worked best to improve it. This report summarizes the recommendations on a wide assortment of effective actions that states can take related to each of several key dimensions of children’s access to oral health care in Medicaid and SCHIP. In addition, the report includes discussion of larger, systemic barriers to access and care that must ultimately be tackled, and advice on how Medicaid and SCHIP might contribute.

  • Falling Behind: Americans' Access to Medical Care Deteriorates, 2003-2007
    Peter Cunningham and Laurie Felland, Center for Studying Health System Change
    June 2008

    The number and proportion of Americans reporting going without or delaying needed medical care increased sharply between 2003 and 2007. One in five Americans—59 million people—reported not getting or delaying needed medical care in 2007, up from one in seven—36 million people—in 2003. In addition, unmet medical needs increased for low-income children, reversing earlier trends and widening the access gap with higher-income children. People reporting access problems increasingly cited cost as an obstacle to needed care, along with rising rates of health plan and health system barriers.

  • Expanding the Definition of Access: It Isn't Just About Health Insurance
    Allyson Hall, Christy Lemak, Heather Steingraber, and Stephen Schaffer, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
    May 2008

    Measurement of access to health care services is often limited to such variables as having health insurance or a usual source of care. The paper argues for an expanded definition of access measuring whether providers accept a particular form of insurance (overall accessibility), ease of contacting providers for appointments (contact accessibility), length of time it takes to get an appointment (appointment accessibility), and proximity of providers to patients (geographic accessibility). Interviews with Medicaid providers in Florida show that approximately 87% were accepting new patients, but only 68% were accepting new Medicaid patients. The survey also showed that beneficiaries may encounter difficulty in reaching physicians and making appointments: 22% of all calls were not answered on the first attempt and over two-thirds of providers had no weekend or evening hours.

  • Preventive Care for Children in Low-Income Families: How Well Do Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Programs Do?
    Cynthia Perry and Genevieve Kenney, Pediatrics
    December 2007

    Child health problems that are caused or exacerbated by unhealthy behaviors remain a leading cause of medical spending for children. The authors examined receipt of clinician advice by low-income children, comparing children who had public insurance with those who had private insurance, as well as with children who were uninsured for part or all of the year. Results show that enrolling more uninsured children in Medicaid and SCHIP could improve the chances that families receive advice about health behaviors and injury prevention.

  • Paying for Quality: Understanding and Assessing Physician Pay-for-Performance Initiatives
    Jon Christianson, Sheila Leatherman, and Kim Sutherland, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
    December 2007

    Pay-for-performance (P4P) initiatives are being pursued by state Medicaid programs. In 2006, 28 states had adopted some type of initiative, half of which have been in existence for five years or more. However, policymakers have been given little information on the effectiveness of these initiatives in shifting physician practice. Program evaluations indicate that P4P, when combined with other quality initiatives, is associated with quality improvement; however, the role of P4P in contributing to those improvements often is unclear. This report, and the accompanying Policy Brief, reviews the available evidence on the issue and answers important questions.

  • Moving Forward with Quality: State and Federal Approaches to Measure, Manage and Improve Quality in the Medicaid Program
    Lisa Simpson, Gerry Fairbrother, and Joe Schuchter, Center for Children and Families
    December 2007

    As a mainstay of health coverage in the United States and one of the nation’s major health purchasers, Medicaid has an important role to play in moving health care quality efforts forward and improving quality for the populations it serves, especially children. This issue brief provides recommendations at the state and federal levels to improve quality in Medicaid.

  • Health Information Technology: Innovative Applications for Medicaid
    Josh Seidman with David Barish, Center for Children and Families
    December 2007

    Health information technology (HIT) is a key tool that both public and commercial insurers are employing to improve patient care and increase efficiency in the health care system. HIT can help measure quality, facilitate coordination of care, and help to bridge fragmented delivery systems and gaps in coverage. HIT can also help meet the needs of medically fragile populations, minimize unnecessary procedures, and reduce administrative costs. This issue brief highlights some ideas on ways in which states can use information technology to improve efficiency and quality of care in the Medicaid program.

  • Closing the Divide: How Medical Homes Promote Equity in Health Care
    Anne Beal, et al. , Commonwealth Fund
    June 2007

    The Commonwealth Fund 2006 Health Care Quality Survey found that when adults have health insurance coverage and a medical home, racial and ethnic disparities in access and quality are reduced or even eliminated. Replication of this model, particularly among safety net providers, could potentially improve the quality of care delivered to all patients while reducing disparities in care experienced by vulnerable populations.

  • Can Incentives for Healthy Behavior Improve Health and Hold Down Medicaid Costs?
    Pat Redmond, Judith Solomon, and Mark Lin, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
    June 2007

    The impact of individual behavior on the cost of health care is attracting a great deal of attention from policymakers, as a number of Medicaid programs are offering rewards for healthy behavior. States that provide incentives for behavior generally aim to either increase the number of beneficiaries who obtain regular health screenings or to decrease the incidence of smoking and obesity. This report comments that although these are valid goals for state Medicaid programs, there is little hard evidence that incentive programs will actually achieve these goals, particularly in terms of reducing smoking and obesity.

  • SCHIP and Beyond: Improving Health Care Coverage and Quality for Children
    Alliance for Health Reform
    March 2007

    Providing better health care for children involves monitoring quality and making quality improvements, enrolling eligible children in Medicaid and SCHIP, and ensuring that health care systems are responsive to the unique health needs of kids. To discuss issues of quality and access, the Commonwealth Fund and the Alliance for Health Reform sponsored this briefing. A transcript of the briefing is provided, for additional resources, see the Alliance for Health Reform.

  • Physician Pay-for-Performance in Medicaid: A Guide for States
    Karen Llanos, Joanie Rothstein, Mary Beth Dyer, and Michael Bailit, Center for Health Care Strategies
    March 2007

    Over the past few years, pay-for-performance programs have emerged as a promising strategy to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of care for Medicaid and SCHIP beneficiaries. In 2006, the Center for Health Care Strategies conducted a 50-state survey to identify innovative practices in the reimbursement of high-quality health care in the public sector. This guide offers lessons learned from Medicaid, Medicare, and commercial programs.

  • Improving Children's Health: A Chartbook About the Roles of Medicaid and SCHIP
    Leighton Ku and Matthew Broaddus, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
    January 2007

    This chartbook summarizes current knowledge about health insurance coverage, the health needs of low-income children in the United States, and the roles that Medicaid and SCHIP play in improving children’s access to health care and their health status.

  • Quality Performance Measurement in Medicaid and SCHIP: Results of a 2006 National Survey of State Officials
    Lisa Duchon and Vernon Smith, National Association of Children's Hospitals
    August 2006

    Conducted in the spring of 2006, this survey was designed to identify the ways in which state Medicaid and SCHIP programs are currently measuring the quality of care provided to children and families, including those with special needs. The results reveal that the majority of programs across the country are engaged in performance measurement and quality improvement activities of one kind or another, focusing heavily on pediatric preventive and primary care.

  • Beyond Coverage: SCHIP Makes Strides Toward Providing a Usual Source of Care to Low-Income Children
    Amy Quinn and Margo Rosenbach, Mathematica Policy Research
    December 2005

    Having a usual source of care has been linked to many positive outcomes, such as increased use of preventive care, decreased use of emergency room care, and better continuity of care. This report synthesizes qualitative and quantitative evidence on the extent to which SCHIP enrollees report having a usual source of care.